Non Custodial Parent Rights issues like this, arise all over the country, mostly to the detriment of society. Wasting the court’s time on such fly weight matters as, ‘ he did…she did ‘, ‘ she said, he said ‘ should be viewed by the supervising court as rebuttable prima facia evidence of the claimant’s unsuitability for parenting. The innocent child needs her father and Gabriel Aubrey needs the opportunity to develop a normal unmolested parental relationship with the product of his marriage to Halle Barry.
Unfortunately for Halle Berry who clearly thinks in a dislocated reality zone which allows her to think and function in the most obnoxious self centered way imaginable, i.e., with out regard to the child she uses so freely to cloak her own true neurotic designs in this very public family law matter which has been dragging on now for most of the little one’s conscious existence. Fortunately joint parenting rights are beginning to bring balance to what has unnecessarily been a force in the destruction of society in western countries like the USA..
Radar OnlineReport: Officials Want Halle Berry, Gabriel Aubry to Take Parenting ClassesGather Celebs News ChannelThe duo are set to appear in court Monday as Halle continues to try to have the smokin’ hottie stripped of his visitation rights. Social …
Those so blinded by the glare of their own crippling personal inadequacies and capacities for hatred who continue to refuse to cooperate with court orders and guidance generally aimed at the social target of joint parenting, custody, and visitation sharing should be required to undergo mandatory rehabilitation until such time as joint parenting can be assured.
The respective Bar Associations must take a pro-active role to prevent the traditional feeding frenzy so often indulged in by attorneys who tend to camouflage their parasitic manipulation of such cases as, ‘ professionals just trying to resolve civic disputes. ‘ These players need to be dealt with harshly!
Non Custodial Parent Rights Dictate To Dads!
A final note to all non custodial parents caught up in such destructive cases, make sure your house is in order, your attitude is tolerant and professional, and you remain focused on your parenting participation and that which is best for the child. Live your life to be the parent your child needs when and to the extent you are given the opportunity. Society and your child need you now!
Fathers rights groups must get involved now! With the nation’s de facto unemployment rate at 30% and holding for two years now, why is anyone other than the tight little clique of government types and related individuals conspiring to up funding to the Ohio prosecutor’s office in Columbiana county involved in this small but obscene sweetheart proposal?
The de facto unemployment rate nationally cited above is according to the Youngstown State University’s Center For Working Class Studies cited in ‘De facto’ unemployment closer to 30 percent Columbia Business First by Jeff Bell, 11/4/11.
Is the state suddenly flush with money when it is requiring cutbacks in other departments? Is the state of Ohio profiting from broken families on the backs of fathers rights in the same way other states like Alabama allegedly are? See Dads-Can-Win.com blog, Official Misconduct Allegations In Alabama @ http://dads-can-win.com/joint-custody-child-support-allegations-of-outrageous-misconduct Citizens of Ohio, check out this possibility and remember the words, “eternal vigilance”!
Or is the Columbiana County prosecutor’s office irresponsible, calloused, or unable to manage its own funding with the nation’s systemic financial crisis unabated as it is? It sounds like to me that the Citizens of Ohio had better start asking some pointed questions because the standard lets get those fathers rights and the knee jerk logic of the past doesn’t cut it any more!
Are there plans a foot to use the prosecutor to crank up the pressure on these some 11,000 non custodial parent past due child support case files? Are more quasi criminal prosecutions planned? I believe it is time for th policy makers to look at the harm that this issue has done.
I believe that it should be a requirement the prosecutor should not be able just issue arrest warrants for child support arrearages or even threats of same until the prosecutors office files a comprehensive and thorough financial, fathers rights, and family law impact statement with the court and the accused prior to any such action on the part of the prosecutor or the family law court judge.
If so, then this Sheriff of Nottingham mentality needs to be reined in before it does more harm to mothers and children in Ohio’s Columbiana County than it already does! Fathers rights actually has much more to do with family law rights, and all you have to do is look at the statistical night mare that has been created by the wrong public policy.
With the nation and the individual states unable to manage their own finances, the nation’s de facto unemployment at 30%, and non custodial parents among the most financially and legally vulnerable in the overall scheme of things, it would appear to be time to think carefully instead of trying to pick up more political points. After all, non-custodial parents are the least likely to produce positve results, no matter the draconian measures lurking in the back of the minds of a few self righteous folk.
Decision for legal duties could help prosecutor’s office SalemNews.net LISBON – The decision to have all child support collection legal duties performed by the Columbiana County Prosecutor’s Office could help the office at a time when all county depart …
At some point in time, it has to get down to the right thing…the common sense thing … the constitutional thing. Each of these factors deserves a much more prominent place in everyday affairs as does the common sense of fathers rights.
Fathers Rights gets good news in Indiana…not time to celebrate yet, but a bill to cap child support obligations has passed the senate committee that will eliminate payment of child support for children past the age of 19. That’s a novel idea! Perhaps the Indiana legislators, or at least enough of them, finally realize that these unwitting citizens are about to catch on!
Non custodial parents realize that the excesses and largess of state government are driving legislators to seek scapegoats for their fiscal irresponsibilities and develop untold propaganda efforts at every level to deflect and divert criticism of those most responsible for Indiana’s financial woes. After all, the true concern of the legislators is to escape responsibility and maintain their pitiful grasp on local political power. In spite of this realityve they are to be applauded for this very small step in the right direction.
Legislative roundup: Senate panel OKs bill to end child support at age 19Indianapolis StarRobert Scheer / The Star A bill that would change Indiana law so that parents don’t have to pay child support after a child turns 19 passed a Senate committee T …
It is encouraging to see that state legislatures are finally beginning to recognize at least a few of the inadequacies and inequities so prevalent for so long to the disability of primarily the non custodial fathers.
Fathers Rights Abuses Better Have Peaked…It’s Time!
What about the the remaining fathers rights issues that receive no sign of recognition from the establishment that a problem even exists, causing an out of touch system to all but break. For those of you who claim not to see a problem with the child support system for example. Did you not see or get the news of arrest efforts asserted against 16 million men in the USA with alleged child support arrears? Does that not speak of a broken system?
Joint custody child support issues in Florida allow me to report good news in the world of fathers rights whenever it comes along. As Dads Can Win Members will attest, we are dedicated to bringing you the latest in accurate news and poignant, incisive social commentary on all joint custody, child support, visitation, parenting, paternity and related legislatitive issues, strategies, tactics and opportunities of importance to Dads Can Win Members and the fathers rights community at large.
Frequently, it seems, the law is its own worst enemy…creating more animosity where there was almost no potential, in other words, creating issues out of non-issues; and creating more conflict by their very attempts to resolve original conflicts; and supporting the creation of new unwise laws that do all of the above.
Happily, in the instant case it appears that new legislation will put a cap on the erstwhile costly child support termination provisions that have plagued Florida’s non custodial fathers (parents) in the past.
Child Support: When Will it Ever End?Patch.comEvery single person who has minor children pays child support. Whether you are happily married, separated, divorced, or the parent of a child born without a marriage in place, you pay child support. Every …
A small step perhaps, but an indication that legislators are beginning to realize that Dads are not an infinite ATM machine for former wives, that they do love their kids, and they are not the most likely to be involved in child abuse cases that need judicial attention.
It Could Be Done Right!
And then, if we can remember the individual and societal consequences of impeding normal and natural fathers rights to be involved in parenting! And if we can pay attention to the need for men to be part of the working middle class, at least, so contributing to a fairly calculated child support system where there is no government, federal, state or local is allowed to profit broken families, society will indeed be a lot better off!
Fathers rights child custody and the general community of non custodial fathers should get involved in this so-called “Marriage Revolution”. We think this interesting strategy proposal will enter the public debate phase across the country in the coming months.
Get informed now and get involved – the status quo has been a losing proposition…a veritable boon- doggle for decades that has hurt children, families, non custodial fathers rights, the government’s budget, and the taxpayers alike. This could disrupt the current family law power structure, and that would no doubt be good for father s rights!
http://www.thedailyreporter.com/Oct 31, 2011
“Taxpayers are spending a trillion dollars a year to subsidize non-marriage — 75 percent federal and 25 percent by states — which goes to the single mom,” Phyllis Schlafly asserted…
Fathers Rights Custody Left Out … Again?!
Why are governments subsidizing non-marriage?
More pertinent, why are they subsidizing non-marriage to the tune of $ 1 Trillion per year?? Did you know this was the case? What about the men…the other half of this equation? What about fathers rights here? I am not aware of the non custodial father participating in this…anybody else?
Let’s change that and get away from government subsidies for non marriage or at least redirect them toward intact families thus providing incentives to increase intact families.
Most people cannot even contemplate, let alone fathom, $1 trillion per year. That amount begs just a few questions! Questions such as, why non marriage support? What is all of this funding going to? What causes form the funding patterns? Who is voting for these excesses? How do these funded issues line up with the authority given Congress by the Constitution? Where does the money come from? Is it corporate? Is it from wealthy foundations? Government? All of the above?
What audit and oversight checks and balances exist for these subsidies? Is this ‘ pork ‘ or some other kind of monkey business? What is the probable political payoff for these obscene subsidy amounts? Why are we spending these treacherous amounts when the nation is bankrupt and the results are clear? Are there lobbyists involved anywhere in the events that lead up to the funding! Are the people being lied to or defrauded in any way as a result of any aspect of the legislative process, administration process before or after distribution of the funds? And that is just to start the process!
How is this related to child custody you might ask. Simple. The mayhem that family breakups, apparently subsidized to some degree by what is now $1 trillion, have clearly caused society at large, and specifically children and fathers, is a societal tragedy and historical shame.
When a trillion dollars per year subsidizes non marriage, then, unless non-marriage is a fraud, marriage stability is damaged to a corresponding degree. Why? Is this just a fluke? A random happening? Or, is this perhaps a conscious policy direction which evidences what so many have been saying. My sense is yes it is. Clearly, first, the funding of these so called non-marriage issues must be cut off or stopped … cold turkey — private, corporate, or governmental it doesn’t matter! Second, this question must be fully answered, from whence has this now almost ubiquitous policy engineering originated?
When fathers rights child custody and like minded supporters review these issues carefully, Phyllis Schlafly deserves full support! If eternal vigilance is the price of liberty, then it would appear that the people are asleep … mesmerized by political lies and manipulation … complacent … ignorant … or the people simply no longer have the capacity to question authority, i.e., have no practiced critical thinking ability and deserve what ever level of pilferage ensues that will ultimately enslave them all as a result!
Fathers rights principles came out the winner in a long and drawn out Minnesota custody battle which ended with a verdict that squarely supported fathers custody rights and left a town, two counties, and the families involved who were unnecessarily desperately divided and essentially torn to shreds.
One woman, egged on, no doubt, by hysterical sexist supporters (male and female), put up the fight of her life with a ‘ law, consequences, and pain be damned ‘ attitude and lost her bid for judicial support in her quest to force her own reality construct on the court and her former mate. Her position apparently was that fathers rights to see children are subordinate to those asserted by the mother, if they exist at all! As runner up in this absurd fight, she came away with 3 felony convictions, as she well should have! Moms beware — joint parenting rights are alive and well!
Fortunately this clear minded judge, correctly, did not view this case as being about any sexist issues but rather a simple matter of whether or not the criminal defendant (the mother) actively and knowingly deprive her former husband of his parental rights.
Long custody battle produces guilty verdictChaska HeraldA long-running custody battle involving a Chanhassen family produced a guilty verdict from a Carver County jury Dec. 23. The jury found Caroline Rice, 46, guilty of three counts of depriving her …
Society appears to be getting the message that if you mess with the parental rights of fathers to the extent that the children are denied the benefits of their dad, all of society suffers. Forty years of policy which often set the stage for and brought about the deprivation of fathers parenting rights en mass for decades, left children’s lives tragically scarred and often destroyed by the millions.
Parents (mothers in particular) need to take careful note that the big loser in this case was the mom. She has lost her liberty and is facing the loss of more; she is a convicted felon – losing rights connected therewith; she has economically self destructed; she lost her marriage which at one time had potentially incalculable short and long term benefits ; she has wrongfully manipulated the alienated the children’s natural affections for their father; she has socially damaged her children; she has selfishly deprived them of a safe nurturing home environment and the love and affection of their father.
All of that aside, it is this writer’s opinion that she should not be allowed to keep her nurse’s license because she is unable to distinguish or control the exercise of her feelings, likes, and opinions from the wisdom and rigidity of the law.
Fathers Rights Supporters Send Huge “Thanks” To The Father
And, lastly, a huge “thank you” to the father in this case for standing up to the ferocious and devastating attack on his parental and fathers rights, in the face of tremendous personal economic costs! Hopefully, the children will in time understand their father and will insist on their mother’s contrition and soundly reject her “poor me, victim” psychology”.